Review Article| Volume 28, ISSUE 1, P1-12, March 2023

Download started.


Biomechanics and Tribology of Total Ankle Replacement

Published:January 02, 2023DOI:


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.


      Subscribe to Foot and Ankle Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Saltzman C.L.
        • Salamon M.L.
        • Blanchard G.M.
        • et al.
        Epidemiology of ankle arthritis: report of a consecutive series of 639 patients from a tertiary orthopaedic center.
        Iowa orthopaedic J. 2005; 25: 44
        • Glazebrook M.
        • Daniels T.
        • Younger A.
        • et al.
        Comparison of health-related quality of life between patients with end-stage ankle and hip arthrosis.
        JBJS. 2008; 90: 499-505
        • Terrell R.D.
        • Montgomery S.R.
        • Pannell W.C.
        • et al.
        Comparison of practice patterns in total ankle replacement and ankle fusion in the United States.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2013; 34: 1486-1492
        • Vickerstaff J.A.
        • Miles A.W.
        • Cunningham J.L.
        A brief history of total ankle replacement and a review of the current status.
        Med Eng Phys. 2007; 29: 1056-1064
        • Lord G.
        • Marotte J.H.
        Total ankle replacement (author's transl).
        Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur. 1980; 66: 527-530
        • Gougoulias N.E.
        • Khanna A.
        • Maffulli N.
        History and evolution in total ankle arthroplasty.
        Br Med Bull. 2009; 89: 111-151
      1. Cifaldi AJ, Barton EC, Roukis TS, et al. Total ankle replacement based on worldwide registry data trends. InPrimary and revision total ankle replacement 2021 (pp. 13-27). Springer, Cham.

        • Kooner S.
        • Marsh A.
        • Wilson I.R.
        • et al.
        History of total ankle replacement in north America. InPrimary and revision total ankle replacement.
        Springer, Cham2021: 3-12
        • Sopher R.S.
        • Amis A.A.
        • Calder J.D.
        • et al.
        Total ankle replacement design and positioning affect implant-bone micromotion and bone strains.
        Med Eng Phys. 2017; 42: 80-90
        • Schipper O.N.
        • Haddad S.L.
        • Fullam S.
        • et al.
        Wear characteristics of conventional ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene versus highly cross-linked polyethylene in total ankle arthroplasty.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2018; 39: 1335-1344
        • Choi W.J.
        • Kim B.S.
        • Lee J.W.
        Preoperative planning and surgical technique: how do I balance my ankle?.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2012; 33: 244-249
        • Simonson D.C.
        • Roukis T.S.
        Incidence of complications during the surgeon learning curve period for primary total ankle replacement: a systematic review.
        Clin Podiatric Med Surg. 2015; 32: 473-482
        • Wales N.
        • NJR for England
        Ireland and the Isle of Man 2021. National Joint Registry 18th Annual Report. National Joint Registry | 18th Annual Report. [Online].
        (Available from:) (Accessed 5 May 2022)
        • Zaidi R.
        • Cro S.
        • Gurusamy K.
        • et al.
        The outcome of total ankle replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Bone Joint J. 2013; 95: 1500-1507
        • Espinosa N.
        • Wirth S.H.
        Revision of the aseptic and septic total ankle replacement.
        Clin Podiatric Med Surg. 2013; 30: 171-185
        • Besse J.L.
        Osteolytic cysts with total ankle replacement: frequency and causes?.
        Foot Ankle Surg official J Eur Soc Foot Ankle Surgeons. 2015; 21: 75-76
        • Stratton-Powell A.A.
        On the failure of total ankle replacement: a retrieval analysis PhD Thesis, University of Leeds.
        Date accessed: April 19, 2022
        • Usuelli F.G.
        • Maccario C.
        • Manzi L.
        • et al.
        Clinical outcome and fusion rate following simultaneous subtalar fusion and total ankle arthroplasty.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2016; 37: 696-702
        • Stauffer R.N.
        • Chao E.Y.
        • Brewster R.C.
        Force and motion analysis of the normal, diseased, and prosthetic ankle joint.
        Clin orthopaedics Relat Res. 1977; : 189-196
        • Segal A.D.
        • Cyr K.M.
        • Stender C.J.
        • et al.
        A three-year prospective comparative gait study between patients with ankle arthrodesis and arthroplasty.
        Clin Biomech. 2018; 54: 42-53
        • Ingrosso S.
        • Benedetti M.G.
        • Leardini A.
        • et al.
        GAIT analysis in patients operated with a novel total ankle prosthesis.
        Gait & posture. 2009; 30: 132-137
        • Hahn M.E.
        • Wright E.S.
        • Segal A.D.
        • et al.
        Comparative gait analysis of ankle arthrodesis and arthroplasty: initial findings of a prospective study.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2012; 33: 282-289
        • Ling J.S.
        • Smyth N.A.
        • Fraser E.J.
        • et al.
        Investigating the relationship between ankle arthrodesis and adjacent-joint arthritis in the hindfoot: a systematic review.
        JBJS. 2015; 97: 513-519
        • Fritz J.M.
        • Canseco K.
        • Konop K.A.
        • et al.
        Multi-segment foot kinematics during gait following ankle arthroplasty.
        J Orthopaedic Research®. 2022; 40: 685-694
        • Seo S.G.
        • Kim E.J.
        • Lee D.J.
        • et al.
        Comparison of multisegmental foot and ankle motion between total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis in adults.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2017; 38: 1035-1044
        • Sanders A.E.
        • Kraszewski A.P.
        • Ellis S.J.
        • et al.
        Differences in gait and stair ascent after total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2021; 42: 347-355
        • Lenz A.L.
        • Lisonbee R.J.
        • Peterson A.C.
        • et al.
        Total ankle replacement provides symmetrical postoperative kinematics: a biplane fluoroscopy imaging study.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2022; 43: 818-829
      2. ISO 22622:2019(en) Implants for surgery — Wear of total ankle-joint prostheses — Loading and displacement parameters for wear-testing machines with load or displacement control and corresponding environmental conditions for test.

        • Bell C.J.
        • Fisher J.
        Simulation of polyethylene wear in ankle joint prostheses.
        J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater. 2007; 81 (The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials): 162-167
        • Affatato S.
        • Leardini A.
        • Leardini W.
        • et al.
        Meniscal wear at a three-component total ankle prosthesis by a knee joint simulator.
        J Biomech. 2007; 40: 1871-1876
        • Smyth A.
        • Fisher J.
        • Suñer S.
        • et al.
        Influence of kinematics on the wear of a total ankle replacement.
        J Biomech. 2017; 53: 105-110
        • Bischoff J.E.
        • Fryman J.C.
        • Parcell J.
        • et al.
        Influence of crosslinking on the wear performance of polyethylene within total ankle arthroplasty.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2015; 36: 369-376
        • Reinders J.
        • von Stillfried F.
        • Altan E.
        • et al.
        Force-controlled dynamic wear testing of total ankle replacements.
        Acta Biomater. 2015; 12: 332-340
        • Hopwood J.
        • Redmond A.
        • Chapman G.
        • et al.
        Influence of implant size on the wear performance of a total ankle arthroplasty.
        InOrthopaedic Proc. 2020; 102 (The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery): 64
      3. Smyth A., Wear of a Total Ankle Replacement PhD thesis, University of Leeds, Available at:

        • McEwen H.M.
        • Barnett P.I.
        • Bell C.J.
        • et al.
        The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements.
        J Biomech. 2005; 38: 357-365
        • Currier B.H.
        • Hecht P.J.
        • Nunley J.A.
        • et al.
        Analysis of failed ankle arthroplasty components.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2019; 40: 131-138
        • Ho N.C.
        • Park S.H.
        • Campbell P.
        • et al.
        Damage patterns in polyethylene fixed bearings of retrieved total ankle replacements.
        Foot Ankle Surg. 2021; 27: 316-320
        • Koivu H.
        • Kohonen I.
        • Mattila K.
        • et al.
        Long-term results of scandinavian total ankle replacement.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2017; 38: 723-731
        • Terrier A.
        • Larrea X.
        • Guerdat J.
        • et al.
        Development and experimental validation of a finite element model of total ankle replacement.
        J Biomech. 2014; 47: 742-745
        • van Hoogstraten S.W.
        • Hermus J.
        • Loenen A.C.
        • et al.
        Malalignment of the total ankle replacement increases peak contact stresses on the bone-implant interface: a finite element analysis.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23: 1-9